McDonough et al. 2026 / NNYFS muscular fitness

Full name
Muscular Fitness Levels of U.S. Children and Adolescents
Year
2026
Sample size
n = 1.2K
Population
US children and adolescents examined in the nationally representative 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey; 1,209 participants aged 6 or older at the examination had a recorded plank time
Study type
Peer-reviewed secondary analysis of a cross-sectional, nationally representative complex survey; FitnessNorms age-by-sex percentile derivation from public microdata
Link
DOI: 10.18122/ijpah.5.2.3.boisestate

About this reference

McDonough et al. analyzed plank, modified pull-up, knee-extension, and handgrip data from the 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey using SAS survey procedures. Table 2 publishes weighted P10, P25, P50, P75, and P90 values separately for the overall sample, males, females, ages 6-11, and ages 12-15. FitnessNorms downloaded the public Y_PLX and Y_DEMO files, retained recorded plank times for participants aged 6 or older at the examination, applied the NNYFS MEC examination weight, and calculated P5, P25, P50, P75, and P95 in each crossed sex-by-age cell. The weighted empirical CDF uses the interpolation definition documented for SAS PROC SURVEYMEANS. Eligibility keys on RIDEXAGY, the age at examination, rather than RIDAGEYR, the age at screening. That is the specification which reproduces the published analysis exactly: the same 1,209 plank records, the same 69.6-second weighted mean, and all 25 published marginal cut-points to the printed decimal. Screening age instead returns 1,201 records and leaves residuals of up to 0.6 seconds against the paper.

Known limitations

Used for